A: Bitcredit is not an altcoin. It is a claim to future bitcoin. It is a money substitute with two additional attributes vs bitcoin:
(1) a maturity date
(2) an issuer
A: It is a portmanteau, short for "Bitcoin credit money". One bitcredit is a claim to one future bitcoin.
A: No. Held in your non-custodial wallet, bitcredit is non-inflationary, trust-minimised credit money. If you wish to earn interest you can lend it out, thereby accepting credit risk.
A: No, much better. Stablecoins are not really 'stable'. They are pegged to some governement's fiat money, thus inflationary at politicians' discretion. With an elastic supply layer, a free market mechanism will stabilise the value of Bitcoin.
A: 'Credit' is a promise of money in the future. Credit money is actual money. It is created in payment for real goods or services rendered. This is 'value given', like a proof of work.
A: It is a time-proven, private payment instrument which has been in use since the Middle Ages. The Geneva Convention of 1930 regulates them, world-wide.
A: The UN Vienna Convention of 2017 approved a model law for electronic bills of exchange. The UK enacted the law in September 2023, as the first major trading nation to do so.
A: Long forgotten basics! Here is a nice, geeky explainer.
A: Bitcoin is legal tender in El Salvador, so why not?
A: In B2B, payment with an e-bill will likely become the norm. Businesses will grant a discount for payment in outright Bitcoin.
A: A credit mint - a 'wildcat' - splits an e-bill's amount into e-cash tokens redeemable in Bitcoin, like standardised fungible e-bills.
A: Bitcredit mints run "Wildcat" , a free open source software. They transform eligible commercial e-bills into bitcredit and guarantee e-bill redemption with verifiable capital. This minimises the residual trust requirement from end users.
A: No, they cannot. Bitcredit Protocol only permits the minting of e-bills verifiably issued against real value as proof of work.
A: A dishonest wildcat would destroy its profitable business for next to no gain. Failure to redeem even a single e-bill is an immediately red flag for the entire mint.
A: Initially yes, it is a chicken-egg problem. The monetisation and stabilisation of bitcoin must start somewhere. We expect volatility to decline rapidly with the buildup of a credit superstructure backed by real goods.
A: With the monetisation premium, Bitcoin's value will rise to its true, natural level and stabilise.
A: Without elasticity, Bitcoin cannot serve the real economy. Its current use case as a store of value may continue for a while, however if some other digital currency, like a CBDC, succeeds as a general medium of exchange, the value of Bitcoin will evaporate.
A: The general purchasing power of a 'stable' money remains roughly equal. It reflects conditions of production and supply and cannot be debased by government. Its price may still fluctuate but market forces will soon revert it to its true value.
A: Think of Bitcoin as a fixed quantity of base money (MO), similar to gold coins in the past. Today, it is hard to imagine that the value of gold was stable $20 for more than a century. Issuance of "yellowback" $20 banknotes balanced money supply with demand.
A: Exactly. When businesses experience high money demand, the free market will create more suppy, for a price.
A: Not with a sound money policy: issuance against real value only, no more thin air. Central banks cause inflation when they print money to "buy" government debt which is a naked promise of future value.
A: In a free market, mints' fees will rise with increasing money demand. This regulates credit money supply.
A: Bitcredit verifiably clears on mainchain against outright Bitcoin. Redemption burns Bitcredit. Hence, no inflation. Remember the old Law of Reflux?
A: For individual end users, Bitcredit payments give privacy because Bitcredit mints issue private e-cash. Bitcredit clearing on mainchain only shows final UTXO balances, usually for B2B players.
A: Every e-bill is encrypted by a unique key pair, only known to the involved business partners. If desired, e-bills can satisfy KYC and AML requirements.
A: Mints are the final e-bill party, known to the other parties. Usually, they are in some established, long-term business relationship with the e-bill payer or the prior endorser of an e-bill.
A: No. It is the payer of the underlying e-bill who must pay. Bitcredit splits the e-bill payment input into Bitcoin UTXOs which only your private key can spend.
A: No. In this case, the mint must sell e-IOU capital for Bitcoins and redeem your Bitcredits.
A: Bitcredit has a decentralised "ungovernance" which means:
(1) deliberative processes (structured debates, prediction markets, unconferences, polls),
(2) concluded by transparent voting weighted by eIOU holdings,
(3) which establishes the non-binding general will of contributors to the projrect.
A: TI their own interest as guarantors, the wildcats check the encrypted invoice.
A: The Bitcredit network is decentralised, it needs no central supervisor. Mint supervise each other.
A: A good base money needs a stable purchasing power. If bitcoin holdings were to guarantee mints' fluctuating issue of Bitcredit, fluctuating demand for Bitcoin would cause price volatility.
A: Gold is not a good reserve asset for a Bitcoin system:
(1) High risk of political capture, like so often in the past.
(2) Unacceptable trust required, or trust in auditors.
(3) Handling cost and slow recourse process.
A: They can buy from contributors. In time, the project governance will consider if future eIOU issue be sold to prospective mint operators in a more organised sale process. All proceeds go to fund development.
A: Businesses and end users are not concerned with eIOU. Only Bitcredit mints need them to prove their dedicated guarantee capital.
A: No, it is not. eIOUs are a digital commodity. They are no investment in any entity, they give no rights and pay no dividend. They do nothing. You can buy and sell them, like any commodity.
A: No, you cannot. "Meta money" means that it has a systemic function in a monetary system. In simple words, it absorbs Bitcoin's volatility to stabilise its purchasing power.
A: Not quite. It enables bitcoinisation, the emergence of a Bitcoin based monetary system: eIOU absorbs Bitcoin's volatility and helps to stabilise it at its natural fundamental value.
A: No, they are issued similar to Bitcoin's halving, by a geometrically declining issue every 3 months, roughly 13,500 Bitcoin blocks. Voting of eIOU distribution for delivered work is done monthly, roughly 4,500 Bitcoin blocks.
A: The genesis issue comprised 42 million eIOU for the first 3 months, the size of each subsequent quarterly issue declines by 4.2%. In total there will be 1 billion eIOU when Bitcoin reaches its supply maximum of 21 million.
A: Contributors of Bitcredit work items receive rewards in eIOU agains proof of work, subject to voting. Feel free to apply with a proposed contribution or deliverable.
A: BRC-20 sits on Bitcoin mainchain, it is available now and does the job. Bitcredit's production version may upgrade to a better solutions. Candidate technologies are: Taproot Asset Protocol, RGB, Runes, or CBRC-20.
A: Game theory. Any unpaid e-bill "dishonours" its payer. It also blocks further Bitcredit creation by its mint, like a red traffic light, until they honour their guarantee. So, mints better pay up fast.
A: It a new take on full reserve banking, proof of value. With Bitcredit Protocol, it is the e-bill's payer who redeems Bitcredit with Bitcoin exactly at maturity, not earlier not later. No more bank runs.
A: There will be time deposits but no more demand deposits because Bitcoin and Bitcredit are non-custodial. In future, borrowers will want the lender to send the full amount immediately to their wallet.
A: The Bitcredit system neither has, nor needs, a lender of last resort. It is atomically decentralised through e-bills with strong guarantee chains, default is rare and of no systemic consequence.
A: Prof. Antal Fekete wrote the Neo-Austrian Manifesto in 2013 against the ossification of Austrian Economics and proposed several new ideas, including a new take on the Real Bills Doctrine.
A: If Bitcoin had to satisfy the transactional needs of the whole planet, its energy consumption would be enormous. Bitcredit Protocol keeps both price and energy consumption on a sustainable level.